Service

Material flow analysis, simulation and optimization

We analyze real material flows, use simulation to de-risk complex decisions and develop implementable improvements for processes, layouts and technology.

In brief

Bross Consulting combines material flow analysis, simulation and optimization in one integrated service: volumes, routes, inventory and bottlenecks are made transparent; dynamic questions are tested through simulation; and the results become evaluated process, layout and technology measures with an implementation roadmap.

Analyze material flow before changing the system

Material flow analysis creates a transparent picture of the current state or a planned volume structure. It examines sources and sinks, transport relations, quantities, frequencies, routes, inventory, process times and space. This reveals bottlenecks, unnecessary transport, crossing traffic, missing buffers and conflicts between production and logistics.

Depending on the question, we examine a single area, a production line, a warehouse or the entire plant. The result is not an isolated diagram but a reliable data basis for layout, process and technology decisions.

  • Quantitative: quantities, transport intensity, frequencies, utilization, inventory and times
  • Spatial: routes, distances, areas, crossings, sources, sinks and staging locations
  • Organizational: control rules, priorities, responsibilities, information and order flow

Validate dynamics with material flow simulation

A static analysis reveals volume relationships and structural weaknesses. Material flow simulation adds a dynamic view where temporal dependencies, fluctuating loads or shared resources determine system behavior. A discrete-event model represents processes, resources and control rules over time.

This allows throughput, waiting times, buffers, queues, equipment and vehicle utilization, and robustness under disruption to be compared. Simulation is not an end in itself: model scope and detail follow the concrete decision.

  • Capacity and bottleneck scenarios under different order profiles
  • Dimensioning buffers, transport equipment, AGV/AMR fleets and operators
  • Comparing control rules, shift models and ramp-up scenarios
  • De-risking costly layout and automation decisions

Optimize material flow and translate findings into action

Material flow optimization connects findings from analysis and, where required, simulation with concrete changes. It considers not just transport routes but the interaction of layout, batch sizes, inventory, staging, transport technology, control and organization.

We develop options and evaluate them against agreed criteria such as throughput, space demand, investment, staffing, flexibility, process stability and implementation risk. The outcome is a preferred concept with prioritized measures rather than an unconnected list of ideas.

When is analysis sufficient and when is simulation useful?

QuestionSuitable approachTypical evidence
Which routes and quantities dominate?Static material flow analysisFrom-to matrix, Sankey or spaghetti diagram
Where do spatial conflicts occur?Analysis with layout evaluationTransport intensity, distance and space comparison
How do fluctuations and waiting times interact?Discrete-event simulationThroughput, buffer, waiting-time and utilization distributions
Which fleet or buffer size is robust?Calculation plus simulationPeak-load, disruption and reserve scenarios
Which option should be implemented?Optimization and option evaluationWeighted comparison, economics and roadmap

Data required for analysis and simulation

The required data depth depends on the decision. At project start, we therefore define system boundaries, reference periods, data sources and quality requirements. Missing data is documented as assumptions and tested through sensitivities instead of being hidden behind false precision.

Data areaTypical sourcesUse
Items, volumes and ordersERP, production planning, WMS, transactionsMaterial families, volume structure and load profiles
Processes and timesRoutings, MES, observation, interviewsSequence, capacity, dependencies and control
Inventory and buffersWMS, counts, system extractsCoverage, space demand and decoupling
Layout and routesCAD, 3D scans, factory model, site walksDistances, traffic space and layout options
Resources and disruptionsOperating data, shift models, experienceSimulation of utilization, availability and robustness

Methods and tools matched to the decision

We combine methods instead of treating one tool as the standard answer. Methods include from-to matrices, Sankey and spaghetti diagrams, value-stream and layout analysis, ABC/XYZ segmentation, process data analysis, CAD and digital factory models, and discrete-event simulation.

Depending on the task, we use tools such as visTABLE, Siemens Plant Simulation, CAD systems and matflow. Digital as-built data can be integrated through 3D scanning and digital factory models.

Results and deliverables

  • Agreed system boundary, data basis and documented assumptions
  • Material flow map with sources, sinks, volumes, routes and transport intensity
  • Bottleneck, cause and space analysis with prioritized action areas
  • Where required: a validated simulation model with defined scenarios and KPIs
  • Evaluated process, layout and technology options
  • Preferred option with an economic framework and implementation roadmap

Project process from question to implementation

  1. Clarify objectives and boundaries: decision, KPIs, scope and scenarios are defined.
  2. Capture and validate data: system data, layout, processes and observations form one shared basis.
  3. Analyze material flow: structures, bottlenecks, waste and causes become transparent.
  4. Develop and validate options: solutions are calculated, evaluated and simulated where dynamics matter.
  5. Specify the preferred option: measures, responsibilities, dependencies and next planning steps are defined.

Practical example: from material flow to a better layout

Within a factory planning project, material flow assessment provides the quantitative basis for comparing layout options by performance and robustness as well as space.

Our layout optimization use case for an anonymized compressor manufacturer shows how routings, production orders, movement data and bills of materials support spatial improvements. The learning-factory article Material flow analysis: comparing methods provides a concise methods guide.

Definitions remain documented separately in the glossary: material flow planning, material flow optimization and material flow simulation.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Can analysis, simulation and optimization be commissioned separately?

Material flow analysis, simulation and optimization can be commissioned separately or as one integrated service. The scope follows the decision to be prepared. Simulation is used only where dynamics or interactions cannot be assessed sufficiently with static methods.

When is material flow simulation useful?

Typical triggers include fluctuating order profiles, shared resources, buffer and congestion effects, complex control rules or investments with a high cost of error.

Which data is required?

Depending on the question: items, quantities, sources and sinks, routings, orders, inventory, routes, transport equipment, time models, shift patterns and layout data.

Which tools are used?

Depending on the task, we combine data analysis, Sankey and spaghetti diagrams, from-to matrices, CAD and factory models, visTABLE, Plant Simulation and matflow.

Is the service suitable for brownfield and greenfield projects?

The service supports both brownfield and greenfield projects. Brownfield work focuses on real bottlenecks and feasible improvements; greenfield work validates future volumes, structures and technology options before implementation.

Which results do clients receive?

Typical outputs include a transparent material flow map, documented assumptions, bottleneck and cause analysis, evaluated scenarios, a preferred option and a prioritized implementation roadmap.

Contact

From idea to reliable planning

We create transparency, prioritize scenarios and support implementation.